http://www.srrentzlaw.com/blog/domestic-violence/is-joint-custody-consideration-the-best-starting-point-in-divorce-cases/ by Philadelphia Lawyer Sheryl R. Rentz Wed, 08 Feb 2012 07:48:15 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1 http://www.srrentzlaw.com/blog/domestic-violence/is-joint-custody-consideration-the-best-starting-point-in-divorce-cases/#comment-343 Kim Lesser Wed, 26 Jan 2011 19:44:17 +0000 http://www.srrentzlaw.com/blog/?p=58#comment-343 HB 463 is a peice of legislation that needs to be passed immediately. As it stands today the Family Court System shifts the burden of proof onto the parents. Only one parent will get custody. Usually mother by the statistics. The procedure is gender biased. Not only is it gender biased, unconstitutional for the children and unconstitutional for the non constodial parent. It violates State and US Constitutions in the case of gender bias. The shift of the burden of proof onto any person by the Court is to say that person is guilty without any reasonable evidence. Another civil rights violation for the non custodial parent and the child. Further the court goes onto imply that every adult male is a crimminal by their actions. The process must be seen to be believe (few times). By the way most courts will not open their doors so the public can see a real procedure. This is not just in Pennsylvania but throughout the nation. The total disregard for legal and human rights in the US Family Court is incredible. In Pennsylvania you would think the procedures were that of an overseas country. Numerous civil rights and human right violations while your attorney stands silent. HB 463 absolutely needs passage, the colussion must end. HB 463 is a peice of legislation that needs to be passed immediately. As it stands today
the Family Court System shifts the burden of proof onto the parents. Only one parent will
get custody. Usually mother by the statistics. The procedure is gender biased. Not only is it gender biased, unconstitutional for the children and unconstitutional for the non constodial parent. It violates State and US Constitutions in the case of gender bias. The shift of the burden of proof onto any person by the Court is to say that person is guilty without any reasonable evidence. Another civil rights violation for the non custodial parent
and the child. Further the court goes onto imply that every adult male is a crimminal by their actions. The process must be seen to be believe (few times). By the way most courts will not open their doors so the public can see a real procedure. This is not just in Pennsylvania but throughout the nation. The total disregard for legal and human rights
in the US Family Court is incredible. In Pennsylvania you would think the procedures were that of an overseas country. Numerous civil rights and human right violations while your attorney stands silent. HB 463 absolutely needs passage, the colussion must end.

]]>